Joe WIlson Made Trip To Middle East

Satire
Third rate ambassador Joe Wilson, desiring his privacy, has just returned from a trip to the Middle East, a trip that his wife, a terrible non-covert former CIA analyst, arranged. Wilson met with Iranian President Ahmadinejad and while the two drank mint julep tea, Wilson asked him if Iran had anything to do with the situation in Israel. Ahmadinejad replied that he did not and said that reports indicating he wanted Israel wiped off the map were manufactured by George Bush in order to make a case for war against his peaceful country.

From Iran Wilson traveled to Syria where he met with Hezbollah and Hamas representatives. Wilson asked them if they sneaked into Israel and kidnapped Israeli soldiers. While sipping mint julep tea, Wilson listened to these leaders deny such a charge and say that this was George Bush’s manufactured story to incite anger and violence in the Middle East. One representative, who asked to remain anonymous because he is wanted in 50 countries said, “We are a peaceful people and have never been involved in violence. The US came in here on trumped up charges that you, Mr. Wilson, exposed. We would not be in such a state if the Zionists in Israel were not war mongers intent on eradicating our peaceful religion of Islam, Allah be praised.”

Mr. Wilson returned to the US where he wrote an OP-ED piece in The New York Times. In the piece he stated that Vice President Dick Cheney’s office requested that he go to the Middle East. He indicated that anyone who suggests that his wife had anything to do with it is only trying to discredit him and out her as a retired CIA analyst. The piece goes on to say:

While I sat in various locations throughout the Middle East drinking mint julep tea, I asked many questions and received honest answers from a misunderstood people. They told me, quite frankly, that they had nothing to do with any of the items attributed to them including the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers and the support of Hezbollah by Iran. These were peaceful meetings and I was awestruck at how the Islamic world only wants to live in peace but are stopped in every attempt by George Bush and the Zionists in Israel.

I can only conclude that the Islamic nations in the Middle East had nothing to do with the violence that is occurring and that George Bush greatly exaggerated or flat out lied when he said that the Israeli soldiers had to be released. It is obvious from my meetings that no Israeli soldiers are being held and that this is a lie set up by the Bush administration to justify more violence in a part of the world synonymous with peace. Hezbollah’s claim that they have no rockets and have not fired into Israel coupled with their adamant denial of soldier kidnappings leaves me to believe that, once again, George Bush lied us into conflict. George Bush used his puppets in Israel by feeding them false information and stirred them into violence. I believe the claims by Hezbollah, Hamas, and Iran that the Special Operations guys in the US Army carried out these attacks to bolster support for the continued conflict.

Please be sure to watch your local bookstores because my new book, Bush Lied, Valerie Cried, and I love Mint Julep Tea, which I will write as soon as we are done suing Cheney, Rove, and Libby. We are also in the process of adding a guy named Big Dog to the mix because of his connection with the vast right wing conspiracy. We have had some trouble with this because I have ascertained that Big Dog shoots liberals first and asks questions later. Valerie and I actually believe that George Bush allowed Big Dog to write about us to intimidate us. He is a more dangerous threat than any so called outing of my wife.”

There you have it. Joe Wilson says it so it must be true. He also wrote it in the New York Times and we know how they feel about George Bush and the Country. The Times Editorial staff has written a piece calling the lies of George Bush and the bloggong of Big Dog a secret anti-terrorism program and therefore believe it is their duty to disclose it. They still stand by their position that the only secret that should have been kept was Plame’s “secret” identity.

End Satire
Cross Posted at Big Dog’s Weblog

Appeasing Terrorists Gets You Nowhere

When this whole war on terror started there were countries that refused to join us. France, Germany, and Russia refused mostly because they were up to their eyes in the oil-for-food scandal. They gave us reasons that they did not want to be there including, of course, if we leave the terrorists alone they will leave us alone. Canada, who did not support us in our efforts found out last week that they are not immune from terrorism when a cell of peaceful Islamic terrorists was captured while planning big attacks in the Great White North.

The modern French do not have a good history with war or defending themselves. They allowed their country to be taken over by the Germans and the US had to go in and get it back for them. They just do not know how to do much except surrender. There attitude is that the terrorists have not bothered them, why should they worry. The terrorists have said they are going to attack the countries that support the US so France should be safe.

Guess again. The French broke up a terror cell that was planning to blow up a bunch of things in Paris including the Eiffel Tower:

A group of Islamist militants who planned an attack on the Eiffel Tower have been jailed by a French court.
Their targets around central Paris also included shops and police stations.

Amazingly, the French were a target even though they left the terrorists alone. Looks like we were right all along. You can not negotiate with a terrorist and we need to capture or kill them before they strike again. If they eventually hit Paris I would hope we would extend the same courtesy to the French that they ex trended to us and mind our own business. They can take care of themselves…

Source: Sky News

Cross Posted at Big Dog’s Weblog, Knickerbocker News and Love America First

Technorati Tags: war, France, terrorism, Eiffel Tower

Technorati Tags: war, France, terrorism, Eiffel Tower

Technorati Tags: war, France, terrorism, Eiffel Tower

Technorati Tags: war, France, terrorism, Eiffel Tower

Technorati Tags: war, France, terrorism, Eiffel Tower

Suicide Bombers Without The Bombs

Three terrorists being held at Club Gitmo in beautiful sunny Cuba hanged themselves over the weekend. Looks like terrorists have been having problems this week with staying in and getting bombed or just hanging around. Well, now we are hearing all the outcry from the people who think that holding terrorists in jail offends them. We even have the Saudis complaining about human rights. Now that in and of itself is a laugh. These terrorists and their supporters could be in the Democratic party the way they keep a straight face when saying such outlandish things. Here are a few quotes from the article:

Military officials said the suicides were coordinated acts of protests, but human rights activists and defense attorneys said the deaths signaled the desperation of many of the 460 detainees held on suspicion of links to al-Qaida and the Taliban.
~snip~
Amnesty International said the apparent suicides “are the tragic results of years of arbitrary and indefinite detention” and called the prison “an indictment” of the Bush administration’s human rights record.
~snip~
To help prevent more suicides, guards will now give bed sheets to detainees only when they go to bed and remove them after they wake up in the morning, Harris said.

Let’s take a look at these things. Will someone explain to me why it is that when a terrorist in jail commits suicide by hanging himself it is an act of desperation but when he straps a bomb to his chest and kills a bunch of women and children he is an insurgent and a freedom fighter protesting the west? Why is it when these guys commit suicide and kill others they are heroes but if they die alone they are not? How is it that Bush can get blamed when a suicide bomber kills himself and many innocents and yet also get blamed when the same kind of person commits suicide and kills no one else? The fact that these guys killed themselves does not bother me one bit. They would have done that if they were free and others would have died. Just consider them suicide bombers in training who failed the class. Additionally, if the dead guys did this out of desperation can we conclude that desperation is what causes them to blow themselves up? Since desperation causes suicide we can now see, with the help of the left, that these suicide bombers kill themselves out of desperation because they are LOSING the war.

Now for the dumb asses at Amnesty International. Let us understand that the first problem with this organization is AMNESTY. That means to forget that a person has done bad things. Like our Senate wants to do with ILLEGALS. One can only hope that the folks from AI are the targets if these monsters are released. However, looking at the statement one has to see the obvious moonbat contradictions. First there is the subtle swipe at the military in the “apparent suicides” (translated: They say it is suicide but the murderers in the military probably did it and is trying to cover it up). Then we hear about these suicides being the tragic results of us holding them captive, blah, blah. OK, then what events cause these guys to blow themselves up when they are not captive? When they are not at Club Gitmo and are roaming around the sandbox they should have no reason to commit suicide so why do they? Perhaps, as the Admiral says in the article. They have no regard for human life, ours or their own.

And last, they military will take away bedsheets in the morning and issue them at night. What do you want to bet that some jackass from the left side of Congress calls this torture? My God, we can not take away their sheets! If we do that what will they wear on their heads? I say why should we give them any sheets at all? They are used to sleeping on the sand, not having bed sheets should be no problem. But if they are bound to hang themselves then I say given them a whole linen closet full of sheets. But mark my words, someone will complain that these terrorists are being deprived of bed sheets.

Oh yeah, prisoners in US jails commit suicide all the time. If we follow the logic of these folks, we will need to release all criminals so they do not become desperate. Oh wait, the only people our government lets get away with crime are the ILLEGALS…

They had better be careful down at Club Gitmo or John Murtha is going to accuse them of murder……

Source: My Way News

Cross Posted at Big Dog’s Weblog

Technorati Tags: murtha, suicide bomber, Gitmo, Amnesty International

Technorati Tags: murtha, suicide bomber, Gitmo, Amnesty International

Technorati Tags: murtha, suicide bomber, Gitmo, Amnesty International

Technorati Tags: murtha, suicide bomber, Gitmo, Amnesty International

Who Is It Now

Let a bunch of terrorists fly planes into American buildings and kill 3000 people and we get a lot of tough talk from countries like Germany, France, and Russia but when it comes time to put up or shut up they are more likely to shut up. They had a lot to worry about because they were in up to their elbows in the oil for food scandal and since many weapons were found in Iraq that came from them it is no wonder they opposed our invasion. When America used intelligence from all over the world to assess Iraq the Democrats accused us of cooking the books and fabricating a case for war. Now, the countries who would not step in are in a very awkward position. They face a closer to home terrorist threat and they are nervous.

Iran has restarted its nuclear program. Only an idiot believe they restarted because they never stopped. They have been working on this stuff all along and I would say they have progressed further that we think because they are making a lot of noise indicating they are not worried about other countries. They might even already have a nuke and are looking for a reason to use it. Whatever the case, the intelligence that surrounds this does not include any from the US (or at least none publicly acknowledged). All the reported intelligence came from that side of the world.

The thing is, the other countries are now worried that Iran might pop a nuke in their butts. They should be worried because the terrorist running Iran has made it clear he would wipe Israel off the map. Strange how when it is in their back yards they are more concerned and willing to take action. When the US was talking about UN security council sanctions (in addition to the many resolutions) there was indications that some of the permanent members would vote against us. One vote stops the action. Now, we have them wanting (along with us) to go to the UN for sanction. I know we will vote with them but it would be nice to screw them by voting against. Maybe this is why Merkel from Germany was here. She is afraid the US will not back them because they did not back us. After all, the nuke problem over there does not affect us directly. It is unlikely they have a missile that could hit us. I think we should let Germany, France, and Russia make their own decisions and fight their own wars, if any, in Iran.

Why should we get involved? We have our own business to tend to in Iraq and we should not be the lead on the one in Iran. The other countries are more affected, let them develop a coalition and go fight while we sit back and say how terrible they are and that they lied and people died blah blah. Yeah, that is it. We should tell them we will consider their position in the UN and will vote with them if we can. Then we can tell them we do not agree with them invading Iran because there is no connection between Iran and nuclear terrorism since they have never attacked anyone with nukes. We can tell them that if they do go to war we can not commit our troops and that we will criticize them and the elected leaders daily about the hundreds of thousands of people they killed even if they did not.

It is really strange how a country’s position changes when it is in danger. We warned that leaving terrorist regimes unchecked would lead to trouble but no one listened. Now, they are making the same claims about Iran that we made about Iraq. Funny how the focus changes. So have fun, let us know if it gets too tough.

Source

Cross Posted at Big Dog’s Weblog

Who Is The Real Threat

Former Vice President (and does it not seem ironic that the term VICE has a whole new meaning considering who the President was?) Al Gore is going to give a speech and talk about George Bush’s assault on the Constitution. This is going to be the election year mantra. We see the moonbats already tagging it as illegal without a judicial ruling. All through Judge Alito’s harassment we heard “President illegally wiretapped” or ” illegal electronic surveillance of Americans.” These sentences are the new talking points designed to plant ideas in the mush filled heads of the Democrat’s constituency. The Senate will have hearings to decide if the surveillance was legal. It is also worthy to note that the focus will be on people who were already under suspicion. To hear the donk leaders talk you would think that every conversation in the world is being listened to.

Al Gore is going to blast the President for violations of the Constitution. He has been sore since he did not win the lawsuit THAT HE FILED in the 2000 election. The Supreme Court ruled against him so the SCOTUS and the President must be abusing powers. I really can’t fault Gore too much. The man has to make a living and how better than to charge a bunch of dunder heads money to listen to you spew garbage. Gore is a rich man so it is hard for him to make ends meet without such speaking engagements. He could just involve himself in his family tobacco interests but that would not put him in the spotlight. You see, people like Gore need to be out in the public to feel some sense of self-worth. It is tough for Gore because he and John Kerry are the only two members of a very small club. It is the club for people who were defeated in a Presidential election by a man they both considered less intelligent than they.

Must be tough to get beaten by a man you consider inferior to you. That is why Gore needs the ego boost every once in a while. Since Gore was part of the administration that allowed the events leading to 9/11 to grow, who is the real threat to our way of life?

Source

Cross Posted at Big Dog’s Weblog

So Cut Down The Trees

For years the environmentalists have had this theory of Global Warming. It could not be proven and there was no concrete evidence but they ran with it anyway. The liberals tend to do that with things they like such as evolution. That theory has holes in it but is taught in schools while “Intelligent Design” is not taught because it is espoused by religions and can not be proven. We have heard the different theories that Global Warming is caused by too many gasses trapped in the atmosphere and in effect trapping light which turns to heat energy. Then, when scientists said the air was cleaner than before we were told that too much sunlight was adding to Global Warming. Now we have another culprit in the Global Warming debate and it turns out it is not mankind (though sunlight can not be controlled by man we were at fault for having cleaner air). That culprit….plant life.

They produce about 10 to 30 percent of the annual methane found in the atmosphere, according to researchers at the Max-Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, Germany.

So the fact that we have more trees now than a hundred years ago indicates that reforestation has increased greenhouse gasses? Wow, all those environmentalists who went around spiking trees and committing other acts of eco-terrorism were actually responsible for more plant life being left to kill us. The loggers seem to have had it right from the start.

Perhaps we need to rethink this Kyoto idea and stay really far away from it before other countries forbid us from growing flowers and shrubbery. God forbid you plant a tree on Arbor Day, you might end up in the gulag. Of course, this could turn out to be junk science like the rest of it. Who knows, maybe they got the Korean Cloning specialist (whose research would have saved Superman) to do the research.

Source

Cross Posted at Big Dog’s Weblog

Liberals, The Same Everywhere

The one thing about liberals that is constant is that they are the same everywhere and that includes outside the boundaries of the US. They are quick to judge people, quick to suggest corrections, and quick to denigrate people if they are not like the “normal” people. Take, for instance, the leader of the Russian Liberal party and what he had to say about Condoleezza Rice:

“If she has no man by her side at her age, he will never appear,” Zhirinovsky ranted on. “Condoleezza Rice needs a company of soldiers. She needs to be taken to barracks where she would be satisfied.

“Condoleezza Rice is a very cruel, offended woman who lacks men’s attention,” he added. “Such women are very rough. … They can be happy only when they are talked and written about everywhere: ‘Oh, Condoleezza, what a remarkable woman, what a charming Afro-American lady! How well she can play the piano and speak Russian!’

“Complex-prone women are especially dangerous. They are like malicious mothers-in-law, women that evoke hatred and irritation with everyone. Everybody tries to part with such women as soon as possible. A mother-in-law is better than a single and childless political persona, though.”

Vladimir Zhirinovsky appears to be infatuated with Ms. Rice as a black woman and suggests that she should be raped by a bunch of soldiers to be satisfied. He is suggesting that a group of men having its way with women is what they [the women] need to have the proper attitude and to be less assertive. Now we can understand how guys like Dick Durban and Howard Dean can say the things they do. It is ingrained in them from the roots of their communist buddies. When a guy who praises Hitler, suggests Russia take Alaska back, and encourages the use of nuclear weapons makes statements that are very similar to the rhetoric of the American Democratic party, one needs to question how long that party will survive in this country.

Kennedy and ole’ Vlad would get along great discussing the treatment of women. Throw in a Gary Hart, Bill Clinton, and Gary Condit and you have a real old fashioned gang bang club. I have money on Rice being able to kick the snot out of any of them, including the Russian. Mater of fact, while;e we are talking about what people need, I think he needs a good ass kicking.

Source

Cross Posted at Big Dog’s Weblog

Really Mr. Dean?

In my Federalist Patriot email I saw this interesting quote from Howard Dean in regard to the Jack Abramoff scandal.

“There are no Democrats who took money from Jack Abramoff, not one, not one single Democrat. Every person named in this scandal is a Republican. Every person under investigation is a Republican. Every person indicted is a Republican. This is a Republican finance scandal. There is no evidence that Jack Abramoff ever gave any Democrat any money. And we’ve looked through all of those FEC reports to make sure that’s true.” —DNC Chairman Howard Dean

The Federalist Patriot goes on to ask about a few people who have received some of the money. I wrote a post about this so if Howie wants to do a little research on the subject he can go here and get a list of the 40 Democrats who have taken Abramoff money.

Or maybe it really is as the Patriot puts it:

True to form, many Democrat beneficiaries, like Minority Leader Harry Reid, have no intention of returning the money they received from Abramoff because they maintain that the contributions were perfectly legal. Apparently, the only dirty money is that which Abramoff gave to Republicans.

Cross posted at Big Dog’s Weblog

Ted Kennedy As Reported By The federalist Patriot

I mentioned in a previous post that Ted Kennedy had a lot of nerve to discuss women’s rights or any issues involving women given his history with women. Many of you know that I view Kennedy as nothing more than a womanizing drunkard who killed a woman and used his influence and wealth to cover it up. This is from the Federalist Patriot (in an email) and basically espouses my views (except I would never insult an alien that way):

You heard it here first: Ted Kennedy, the Democrat Party mascot, is a tone-deaf alien from a distant galaxy. How else to explain his impudent inquisition into the integrity of our nation’s next Supreme Court justice, the Honorable Samuel Alito?

In Senate Judiciary Committee hearings this week, Kennedy actually asserted that the nominee’s association with a conservative Princeton alumni group two decades ago should disqualify him from a seat on the High Court.

Well, it’s not as if Judge Alito is a spoiled trust baby who got kicked out of Harvard for cheating. Nor is he a United States senator who got drunk, drove a young female campaign worker to her death, then chose not report it to authorities until the next day, and then, only after calling his lawyer, concocting an alibi and developing a strategy to contain the political fallout.

Only an extraterrestrial could wield so much power over the minds of some Bay Staters, willing them to re-elect him to the Senate in perpetuity. Perhaps they are “Manchurian constituents,” but we digress.

Kennedy is a real piece of dung and it should be an embarrassment to every person from his state to know he represents them. What did Massachusetts do to deserve the punishment of Kennedy and Kerry?

Cross posted at Big Dog’s Weblog

Why We Have The Second Amendment

The Second Amendment is probably the second most debated item in the Bill of Rights after the much maligned First Amendment and the fiasco surrounding Church and State. The founders realized we needed the citizenry to be armed to prevent tyranny from its own government. They also realized that the government and its police forces do not protect people because they are reactionary. You never see the police show up 5 minutes before a crime but they are almost always there after one. One other reason that we have the right to keep and bear arms is to prevent our country from being invaded and taken over from enemies external or from within. That is the part that deals with a well regulated militia (which is not exclusive to the keep and bear part). Unfortunately, those who would exact governmental tyranny are always attempting to disarm law abiding citizens. If they ever succeed it will be the demise of our country and our culture. Terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi has made that abundantly clear in his latest statement.

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, speaking for that coward Osama bin Laden, (who has rarely been seen since the US lit a fire under his ass) says there are two conditions for the end of Holy War:

“First, chase out the invaders from our territory in Palestine, in Iraq and everywhere in Islamic land.

“Second, instal [sic] sharia (Islamic law) on the entire Earth and spread Islamic justice there (…). The attacks will not cease until after the victory of Islam and the setting up of sharia,” he swore.*

This radical islamofascist is not content with having the Islamic lands free of “those who worship the Cross”* but will not be satisfied until Islamic law and justice is imposed upon the Earth. We have seen the result of Islamic law and justice and it usually involves cutting off someone’s head. These cretins would impose their will upon the Earth, a statement that shows the left that our leaving Iraq will not end the terror, and they would push the world back in history where those deemed unworthy are executed and people are denied basic rights for something as inane as simply being a woman. If there was ever any doubt that Murtha, Kennedy, Kerry and the rest of the liberals have it wrong by insisting that pulling out of Iraq will end the violence against the US, this statement should clear that up.

Those of us who believe in the Second Amendment know why it exists and the statement of this terrorist should send a shiver down the spines of every thinking being and enlighten those who oppose the right to keep and bear arms. I know one thing for sure. If the terrorists come around here trying to impose Islamic law they will learn the law of Smith and Wesson. I can promise a lot of them will be looking for their virgins after such a fool hearty adventure.

*Source

Cross Posted at Big Dog’s Weblog